Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the trial had been disposed of, rendering the application infructuous. The court dismissed the application on this ground.
Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2363 of 2019
----
Santosh Kumar Das @ Santosh Das -versus-
The State of Jharkhand
… Petitioner
… Opposite Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rohit Agarwal, Advocate For the State: Mr. Jitendra Pandey, A.P.P.
----
11/ 04.12.2020 Counsel for the petitioner submits that the trial in this case has already been disposed of, thus, this application has become infructuous.
Considering the above submission, this application is dismissed as infructuous.
(Ananda Sen, J.)
Kumar/Cp-03
Santosh Kumar Das @ Santosh Das
The State of Jharkhand
Ananda Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
