Majho Marandi v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
In a bail application concerning a train dacoity case punishable under IPC Sections 395, 397, and 412, the High Court rejected the prayer. The court noted that the trial court report indicated other accused on bail were absconding, hindering case progression. Consequently, bail was denied.
What did the court decide?
Bail prayer rejected; petitioner directed to renew after framing of charges; case split by trial court.