This is a single-line order where the court disposed of the writ petition as the petitioner did not appear. The court noted that SAIL falls under the Central Administrative Tribunal and granted liberty to approach the CAT.
Petition disposed of with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (S) No.913 OF 2014
Anita Kumari
... Petitioner
Vs.
Managing Director, Steel Authority of India Lmt.and ors
….. Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioner :- None
For the SAIL :- xxxx
Order No.4 : Dated 21 st August, 2019
Nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Steel Authority of India Limited has been brought under
the purview of Central Administrative Tribunal.
Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to approach before the Central Administrative Tribunal .
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
SD
Anita Kumari
Managing Director, Steel Authority of India Limited
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
