Rajendra Ram v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
P.W.C. No. 893 of 2018. Upon counsel for the petitioner stating that the writ application is not being pressed and seeking withdrawal, the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
P.W.C. No. 893 of 2018. Upon counsel for the petitioner stating that the writ application is not being pressed and seeking withdrawal, the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 893 of 2018
----
Rajendra Ram
… Petitioner
-versus-
----
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN
----
For the Petitioner : Mr. Nawin Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Kaustav Panda, A.C. to Sr.S.C. III
4/ 11.03.2019 In view of the submissions made in the counter affidavit, counsel for the petitioner is not pressing this writ application and seeks to withdraw the same.
This writ application is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
( Ananda Sen, J.)
Kumar/Cp-02
Rajendra Ram
The State of Jharkhand
Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi
The Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department
The Engineer in Chief, Road Construction Department
District Establishment Collector, Ranchi
Ananda Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court