This single-judge order disposed of a writ petition concerning an appointment dispute at SAIL, holding that the matter fell under the Central Administrative Tribunal's jurisdiction.
Writ petition disposed of with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 4829 of 2010
Suresh Kumar
… … Petitioner
Versus
CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Thakur, Advocate For the Respondent-SAIL : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Sr. Advocate
Order No.-04 : Dated 5th July, 2019
Per Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.
The controversy raised in the writ petition is related to appointment and the Steel Authority of India Ltd. comes under the purview of the Central Administrative Tribunal.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal.
Manish
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should entertain a writ petition regarding an SAIL appointment dispute when the Central Administrative Tribunal has jurisdiction.
Suresh Kumar
The Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Steel Authority of India Ltd. New Delhi
The Managing Director, Bokaro Steel Plant, Bokaro
The General Manager, HRD, Bokaro Steel City, Bokaro
The Assistant General Manager, Personnel/Service Recruitment and FSC, Bokaro Steel City, Bokaro
The Deputy Manager, Personnel & Recruitment, Bokaro Steel City, Bokaro
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
