The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the writ petition as it was not pressed by the petitioner's counsel during the hearing.
Writ petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.3999 of 2016
--------
Manju Rout & Anr. …… Petitioners Versus
Sudha Mishra & Ors. …… Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondents :
03 / Dated 12th July, 2019
Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner,
at the outset has submitted on instruction that he does not intent to press the writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
Madhav
Manju Rout
Sudha Mishra
Sujit Narayan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
