Ayodhya Kumar v. Health
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners withdrew their petitions regarding postgraduate admission preference for doctors in remote areas. The court dismissed the petitions as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
The writ petitions were dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI.
I.A. No. 2986 of 2016
in
W.P. (C) No. 2282 of 2016 With
I.A. No. 3273 of 2016 in
W.P. (C) No. 2164 of 2016
Ayodhya Kumar ......... Petitioner [in W.P. (C) No. 2282 of 2016] Umendra Kumar ......... Petitioner [in W.P. (C) No. 2164 of 2016] -V e r s u s-
1.The State of Jharkhand represented through Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Medical Education & Family Welfare, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi.
2.The Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Medical Education & Family Welfare, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi.
3.The Director-in-Chief, Govt. of Jharkhand, Health Services, Ranchi.
4.The Director, Medical Education, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ayodhya Kumar
- petitioner
Umendra Kumar
- respondent
State of Jharkhand
- respondent
Medical Council of India
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPC/2282/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Ms Aviral Parwati Bhagwati Minerals Alias Ms Shri Aviral Parwatey Bhagwati Minerals Vs the State of Jharkhand
Dukhmani Devi And Ors. Vs Rural Works Department
Ashok Kumar Das Vs State of Jharkhand through Its Chief Secretary
Amit Kumar Jha Vs Jharkhand State Housing Board Through Its Managing Director And Ors.