The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed a pending second appeal from 2001 for non-prosecution after notices were ignored and no one appeared on behalf of the appellants, indicating a loss of interest in the matter.
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution due to the appellants' failure to appear and loss of interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
S.A. No. 39 of 2001
----
M/s. Ador Fontech Ltd. & Another … Appellants
-versus-
Raj Kumar Jain & Others … Respondents
---CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN ----
21/ 08.07.2019 No one appears on behalf of the appellant.
This second appeal is of the year 2001 and is running under the heading “For Admission” , meaning thereby this appeal is yet to be admitted.
In this second appeal, notices were ordered to be issued upon respondents 2 and 3, but, as the order was not complied by the appellants, this appeal stood dismissed so far as respondents 2 and 3 are concerned. The effect of said dismissal had taken place on 06.08.2012.
As no one appears on behalf of the appellants today and the case being of the year 2001, still running under the heading “For Admission” , this Court feels that the appellants have lost interest in prosecuting this appeal any further.
Hence, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Kumar/Cp-02
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the pending second appeal should be dismissed for non-prosecution given the lapse of time and lack of appearance.
M/s. Ador Fontech Ltd. & Another
Raj Kumar Jain & Others
ANANDA SEN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
