Nirmal Chandra Mukhi v. Tata Iron And Steel Co.Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
No one appeared for parties. The second appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
No one appeared for parties. The second appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI S.A. No.23 of 1992 (R)
--------
Nirmal Chandra Mukhi …… Appellant Versus Tata Iron and Steel Company Limited …… Respondents -------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Appellant : None For the Respondents : None
31 / Dated 20th November, 2019
On 05.11.2019, nobody appeared on behalf of the parties.
Today, when the matter was called out, nobody appears on behalf of the parties.
Accordingly, the second appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Madhav/-
Nirmal Chandra Mukhi
Tata Iron and Steel Company Limited
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court