Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that the less amount has been paid to the appellant to the tune of Rs.4,12,700/- along with interest @ 6% per annum from 11.08.2016 but the learned Tribunal has not calculated the compensation amount in accordance with law as laid down in the case of Sarla Verma (Smt) & others vs. Delhi Transport Corporation & another, reported in ( 2009) 6 SCC 121 and in the case of National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Pranay Sethi reported in ( 2017) 16 SCC 680. Learned counsel for the appellants has further submitted that the learned Tribunal has not considered the future prospect of the deceased which should have been calculated @ 25% as the deceased was 43 years of age, thus falls in the age group of 42-50 years, in view of the judgment National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Pranay Sethi (Supra). Learned counsel for the appellants has further submitted that under the conventional head instead of Rs.70,000/-, the learned Tribunal has only awarded Rs.9,500/-, as such, the amount may be enhanced as per the chart prepared by him and copy of the same has already been given to the learned counsel for the respondents. The chart shows that instead of Rs.4,12,700/- the claimants are entitled for a sum of Rs.5,74,000/-.
