The single judge allowed the appellant's prayer to withdraw the civil miscellaneous appeal due to lack of notice issued to the respondent, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn.
Prayer to withdraw the appeal allowed; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI (Civil Miscellaneous Appellate Jurisdiction)
M. A. No. 166 of 2017
Dr. Anand Shankar
............. Appellant.
Versus
Dr. (Mrs.) Aparna Sinha
....... Respondent.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH PRASAD DEO
…......
For the Appellant :Mr. Awanish Shekhar, Advocate. For the Respondent :
05/17.10.2019. Learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. Awanish Shekhar has submitted that he wants to withdraw this appeal as per the instruction of the appellant.
Since no notice has been issued to the respondent the prayer of the appellant to withdraw this appeal is hereby allowed.
Accordingly, this Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Kailash Prasad Deo, J.)
Jay/
Dr. Anand Shankar
Dr. (Mrs.) Aparna Sinha
Kailash Prasad Deo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
