registered sale deed no. 2517 dated 01.07.1992 for the valuable consideration of Rs.33,19,645/-, then the plaintiff immediately requested to the Circle Officer at Jamshedpur in writing not to mutate the Schedule-B property in the name of defendant no.7 and other parties were also informed, but no action was taken in this respect. Defendant nos. 1 to 3 are also trying to alienate the remaining joint properties with an intent to deprive the plaintiff of her 1/7th share in the suit property and, therefore, the suit was instituted. It was also pleaded that Schedule- A and B of the plaint are joint properties of the plaintiff and defendant nos. 1 to 6 and defendant nos. 1 to 3 have no right, title and interest to sell away the property without knowledge and consent of the plaintiff and other defendants by registered sale deed dated 01.07.1992 and thereby defendant no. 7 has not acquired any perfect right, title and interest in the suit property. Defendant no.7 on the strength of the registered sale deed dated 01.07.1992 trying to construct the house and other structure over the Schedule-B property with an intent to deprive the plaintiff of her valuable right, title and interest and joint possession over the suit property, to the extent of her share and, accordingly, it was prayed for a declaration that the sale deed no. 2517 dated 01.07.1992 is a joint property and the sale deed is void ab initio and illegal and not binding on the plaintiff and the properties included in the sale deed is subjected to be partitioned. The cause of action was said to be arose on and from the month of May 1992 when defendant nos. 1, 2 and 3 refused to make amicable partition of the property described in Schedule- A and B of the plaint and, therefore, the suit was instituted.
