A second appeal was dismissed for want of instructions from the appellants after adjournment for a specific enquire
Second Appeal dismissed for default; Interlocutory application, if any, also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
S.A. No. 123 of 2012
Both residents of Ram Nagina Singh Road, Giridih, P.S.-Giridih (T), P.O & District- Giridih ..... Appellants
Versus
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Appellants : Mr. Ayush, Aditya, Advocate. For the Respondents : None
05/Dated 06th November, 2019
Vide order dated 16.07.2019, this matter was adjourned for two week’s to enquire about the status with regard to death of Appellant no.1 and Respondent no.1.
Today, when the matter is taken up, Mr. Ayush Aditya, learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that in spite of his best efforts he has no instruction from his clients.
In view of submission of Mr. Ayush Aditya, learned counsel appearing for the appellants, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default.
Consequently, Interlocutory application, if any, also dismissed.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Raja
JAMUNA DEVI AND NAKUL RANA
CHINTAMANI MITRA AND SHANKUNTAL DEVI
SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
