2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that during the pendency of the present revision, the petitioner and O.P. No.02 have amicably settled the matter and the petitioner has paid the compensation amount of Rs.1,50,000/- to O.P. No.02. 3. Learned counsel for O.P. No.02 has submitted that O.P. No.02 has received the compensation amount of Rs.1,50,000/and he has filed the compromise petition. That in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, O.P. No.02 does not want to proceed further with the prosecution of this case. 4. Heard. Perused the compromise petition. The compensation amount has been paid by the petitioner to O.P. No.02 and on the intervention of well wishers, friends and relatives, both the parties have amicably settled the matter. Thus considering the factum of compromise further continuance of proceedings will only be an exercise of futility, wastage of time and an abuse of the process of Court. Since the offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act is compoundable accordingly, the compromise is accepted and allowed. For the ends of justice, the judgment dated 10.01.2019, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge – II, Koderma, in Cr. Appeal No.92 of 2017, and the judgment dated 16.11.2017, passed by the learned A.C.J.M., Koderma, in connection with Complaint Case No.432 of 2013, corresponding to T.R. No.40 of 2017 are, hereby, set aside.