This division bench dismissed Cr. Revision No. 1812 of 2018 as the petitioner filed without appearing and failed to remove remaining defects in the petition within the extended period granted.
The Criminal Revision petition Cr. Revision No. 1812 of 2018 was dismissed on account of non-removal of defects.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Revision No. 1812 of 2018
Surendra Prasad Verma aged about 54 years, son of Late Sahdeo Verma, resident of Village Regna, P.O. Khanpur, P.S. Khanpur, District Gaya. … … Petitioner Versus
… … Opp. Parties
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
06 /25.11.2019
1. Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner.
2. This petition has been filed for the following reliefs: -
3. Vide order dated 16.10.2019, a prayer was made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, by way of last indulgence, two weeks’ time was granted to the petitioner to remove the remaining defects as pointed out by the Office.
4. As per office note, the remaining defect have not been removed.
5. Accordingly, the present Cr. Revision No. 1812 of 2018 is hereby dismissed on account of non-removal of defects.
6. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX’.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Mukul
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Cr. Revision petition can be allowed despite the failure to remove defects pointed out by the Office within the granted time.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Surendra Prasad Verma
The State of Jharkhand
The Central Bureau of Investigation
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
