Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a criminal revision challenging a maintenance decree. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the revision as withdrawn. An incidental application was also disposed of.
Withdrawal of the criminal revision petition allowed; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Rev. No. 1379 of 2015
Mukesh Soni @ Mukesh Kumar Sony .... ...... Petitioner Versus Poonam Devi & Anr. .... ...... Opp. Parties
--CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR --For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajit Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Moti Gope, APP ---
05/ 12.10.2019 The petitioner has challenged the judgment dated 28.08.2015 passed in Maintenance Petition No.342 of 2014 by which he has been directed to pay Rs.7,000/- per month to his wife.
Mr. Ajit Kumar, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this criminal revision petition.
Accordingly, Cr. Rev. No.1379 of 2015 is dismissed
as withdrawn.
I.A. No.6886 of 2017 stands disposed of.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
R.K.
Mukesh Soni @ Mukesh Kumar Sony
Poonam Devi & Anr.
SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
