The petitioner, aggrieved by a maintenance order, sought to withdraw the criminal revision petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No substantive legal principles were elaborated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Rev. No.1079 of 2015
Allauddin Ansari @ Tetu son of Imtiyaz Ansari @ Imtiyaz, resident of village-Nemuwadih (Pindra), P.O-Jagdishpur, P.S-Madhupur, District-Deoghar …...... Petitioner
-Versus-
All resident of village-Nemuwadih (Pindra), P.O-Jagdishpur, P.SMadhupur, District-Deoghar and at present residing at VillageNaiyadih, P.O-Burhai, P.S-Madhupur, District-Deoghar
.…...Opposite Parties
------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Shambhu Nath Tiwari, Adv. For the State : Mr. Gouri Shankar Prasad, Spl. P.P
08/11.10.2019 The petitioner is aggrieved of the order dated 10.06.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. Case No.155 of 2011, by which he has been directed to pay Rs.2000/- per month to his wife and Rs.1000/per month each to both his daughters.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
sudhir
Allauddin Ansari @ Tetu
Rabina Bibi
Rahina Khatoon
Babu
Shree Chandrashekhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
