This order in contempt proceedings found that the previous court order has been complied with by the opposite parties. Consequently, the court held no case for contempt was made out and dropped the proceeding, disposing of the instant application.
Contempt proceeding dropped and application disposed of as the impugned order was complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. (Cvl.) No. 429 of 2019
….. … Petitioners
Versus
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S. N. PATHAK
----For Petitioners : Dr. S.K. Verma, Advocate For Opposite Parties : AC to GP-I Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate
------
04/ 11.10.2019 Heard the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection to the same. In view of the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, no case for contempt is made out as the order of this Court has already been complied with. Accordingly, the contempt proceeding is dropped .
Resultantly, instant cont. application stands disposed of.
(Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.)
punit/
Sikandar Mallick
Shankar Prasad
Dhananjay Mahto
Rabindra Nath Sharma
Bijay Kumar Pattanaik
Rajendra Prasad Singh
Dr. S. N. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
