Basant Prasad Mahato and Ors. Vs the State of Jharkhand and Others

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

Cont. Case (Civil) No.28 of 2015

¶3

Basant Prasad Mahato,

¶4

Binoy Kant Mahato, @ Binoy Kumar Mahto

¶5

Bimal Mahato,

¶6

Vikash Roy Mahato,

¶7

Birendra Nath Mahato, all father of Late Govind Mahto and resident of P.O. & P.S. Adityapur, District West Singhbhum now Saraikela Kharsawan.

¶8

Smt. Uma Mahto wife of Dr. Lal Mohan Mahato, resident of P.O. & P.S. Adityapur, District West Singhbhum now Saraikela Kharsawan. … … Petitioners

¶9

Versus

¶10

The State of Jharkhand.

¶11

Mr. Chandra Shekhar, Deputy Commissioner, Saraikela – Kharsawan, At & P.O. and P.S. Saraikela, District Saraikela Kharsawan.

¶12

Mr. Sandeep Kumar Daraiburu. District Land Acquisition Officer, Saraikela – Kharsawan, At & P.O. and P.S. Saraikela, District Saraikela Kharsawan.

¶13

The Jharkhand State Housing Board, At + P.O. – Harmu, P.S. Argora. District Ranchi … Opposite Parties

¶14

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY

¶15

--For the Petitioners : Mr. Sardhu Mahato, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sahil, A.C. to G.A. III For the Housing Board : Dr. Ashok Kr. Sinha, Advocate : Mrs. Amrita Kumari, Advocate

¶16

¶17

21/01.04.2019 Counsel for the opposite parties submits that a supplementary show-cause has been filed in this case wherein it has been stated that the order of this Hon’ble court passed in F.A. No.35 of 1994 dated 01.11.2012 and C.M.P. No.340 of 2013 has already been complied. Accordingly, he submits that the present proceeding be dropped.

¶18

2. Counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the submissions made by the counsel appearing for the opposite parties.

¶19

3. Considering the submission made, the proceeding in Contempt Case (Civil) No.28 of 2015 is hereby dropped.

¶20

2

¶21

4. Pending Interlocutory applications, if any, are dismissed as not pressed.

¶22

(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)

¶23

Saurav/

Basant Prasad Mahato and Ors. v. the State of Jharkhand and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Basant Prasad Mahato and Ors. v. the State of Jharkhand and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhasin Construction Co.Pvt.Ltd Vs Union of India And Anr.

Jaishiv Construction Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Director Sri Yatindra Nath Singh Vs The Union Of India Through Dy Chief Engineer South Eastern Railway And Ors.

Ramjee Power Construction Ltd. Through Its Duly Authorized Representative Sri Dharmendra Sharma Vs Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director And Ors.

State of Bihar And Ors. Vs Geeta Devi W/o-Late Rameshwar Prasad

Kashi Nath Mahto Vs the State of Jharkhand and Ors.

D.M.,Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd Vs Enamul Ansari And Anr.