Partly allowed

Rabual Shekh v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC10 Dec 2019A.B.A./7408/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This short order recalled provisional anticipatory bail and dismissed the petitioner's application. The petitioner failed to deposit the required sum of Rs. 50,000 before the trial court within the stipulated timeframe, violating the conditions of the earlier order.

What did the court decide?

Order dated 06.09.2019 recalling bail is set aside; anticipatory bail application dismissed; non-bailable warrant directed to be issued.

Rabual Shekh Vs the State of Jharkhand — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Jharkhand HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B. A. No. 7408 of 2018 Rabual Shekh …… Petitioner

¶2

Versus

¶3

1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Noorjahan Khatoon …… Opposite Parties

¶4

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH

¶5

For the Petitioner :Md. Yasir Arafat, Advocate For the State :A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2: Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate

¶6

09/Dated: 10/12/2019

¶7

Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Barharwa P.S. Case No. 80/2018 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 328 of 2018 for the offence under sections 323, 341, 376, 504, 506 of the I.P.C pending in the Court of Sri. R.K. Pandey, J.M, Ist Class, Rajmahal.

¶8

It appears that under order dated 06.09.2019, the petitioner was granted provisional anticipatory bail and petitioner was directed to deposit Rs. Rs. 50,000/- by way of bank draft drawn in the name of O.P. No. 2 before the trial court latest by 27.09.2019. The O.P. No. 2 was directed to appear before the trial court and file application through learned counsel, thereafter aforesaid bank draft was to be released in favour of O.P. No. 2 after making proper verification.

¶9

Further, the trial court was directed to submit report to this Court on or before 13.11.2019 as to whether petitioner has complied the aforesaid order or not and whether the said amount has been released in favour of O.P. No. 2 or not.

¶10

Report dated 20.11.2019 submitted by Sri Rajiv Ranjan, learned District & Addl. Sessions Judge-1, Rajmahal reveals that neither the petitioner has appeared nor he has deposited a bank draft of Rs. 50,000/- before the trial court.

¶11

Under these circumstances, order dated 06.09.2019, by which the petitioner was granted provisional, bail is hereby recalled, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed.

¶12

The trial court is directed to take all coercive steps against the petitioner including issuance of non-bailable warrant of arrest for his apprehension.

¶13

Let a copy of this order be communicated to the concerned trial court through FAX and a copy of this order be sent to the Superintendent of Police,

¶14

Sahibganj.

¶15

(Anant Bijay Singh, J.)

¶16

Satyarthi/-

Rabual Shekh v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rabual Shekh v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajeev Kumar Singh Vs Steel Authority of India Limit

Binay Kumar Pandey Vs State of Jharkhand And Ors.

Rajeev Kumar Choubey Vs Police

Anurag Singh Alias Bittu Vs the State of Jharkhand

Bipula Devi Vs State of Jharkhand And Ors.

Dr.Md.Shamimuddin Vs State of Jharkhand And Anr.