Allowed

Suresh Prasad Mehta Alias Suresh Mahto v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC19 Feb 2019A.B.A./61/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Ranchi granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners facing charges including Section 498A IPC. The court imposed conditions regarding cooperation with investigation, appearance before the investigating officer, and furnishing of mobile numbers and Aadhar cards.

What did the court decide?

The petitioners were granted privilege of anticipatory bail on conditions of cooperating with investigation and appearing before the Investigating Officer upon notice.

Suresh Prasad Mehta Alias Suresh Mahto Vs the State of… — Dowry and Cruelty | Jharkhand HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

A.B.A. No. 61 of 2019

¶3

Suresh Prasad Mehta @ Suresh Mahto

¶4

Sarswati Devi … Petitioners

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Jharkhand

¶7

Puja Devi … Opposite Parties

¶8

------

¶9

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶10

For the Petitioner : Mr. A. Prasad, Advocate For the State : Addl. P.P.

¶11

------

¶12

Order No.03 Dated- 19.02.2019

¶13

Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Ichak P.S. Case No.111 of 2018 (G.R. No. 1805 of 2018) registered under sections 323/498A/341/307/504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3/4 of D.P. Act.

¶14

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. P.P. for the State.

¶15

The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner no.1 is the father-in-law and petitioner no.2 is mother-inlaw of the opposite party no.2. It is further submitted that the allegation against the petitioners are all false and are general and omnibus in nature. It is, further, submitted that the petitioners are ready and willing to keep and maintain the opposite party no.2 as their daughter-in-law with love and affection when she resumes her conjugal life with the husband. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶16

Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

¶17

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the above named petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on

¶18

bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Hazaribag, in connection with Ichak P.S. Case No.111 of 2018 (G.R. No. 1805 of 2018) with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish their mobile numbers and a copy of their Aadhar Cards in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

¶19

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶20

Sonu/Gunjan-

Suresh Prasad Mehta Alias Suresh Mahto v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh Prasad Mehta Alias Suresh Mahto v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rohit Kumar Prajapati Vs the State of Jharkhand

Parmanand Sah Vs the State of Jharkhand

Akash Kumar Soni Alias Akash Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Nand Kishore Gupta Vs the State of Jharkhand

Pradeep Rout Alias Pradeep Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand

Subhash Ram Alias Subhash Kandhway Vs the State of Jharkhand