informant. It is next submitted that since the informant has not done any work whatsoever in terms of the said agreement, hence he is not entitled to get any amount and accordingly no amount has been paid by the petitioners to the informant and the dispute between the parties is purely a civil dispute. It is next submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners, drawing attention of this Court to annexure -1 and 1/1 at page no. 27-28 of the supplementary rejoinder dated 11.11.2019 to the counter affidavit, that against the receipt of bill amount of Rs.45,12,80,859/-, the petitioners have invested a sum of Rs.64,25,42,111.16 so far as work connected with the agreement with the informant is concerned between the period of 01.05.20105 to 31.10.2016. It is fairly submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners company has received rupees one crore through R.T.G.S. from the informant but it is submitted that the petitioners have already paid Rs.30,00,000/- to the informant and they are ready and willing to jointly pay Rs.70,00,000/- to the informant upon the petitioners reserving their right to add this Rs.70 crores to the claim to be made by the company of the petitioner in the loss occurred to the company of the petitioners because of negligence of the informant as the proprietor of his firm. It is further submitted that besides the agreement, the copy of which has been filed by the informant in his counter affidavit kept at page no. 29 onwards of the counter affidavit as annexure-2 to the counter affidavit; that the company of the petitioner and the informant also entered into an agreement, the copy of which has been kept at page no.33-35 of the rejoinder to the counter affidavit dated 25.07.2019. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.
