Criminal petitioners failed to appear on anticipatory bail application despite summons. The High Court rejected the application as not pressed by the petitioners.
Anticipatory bail application rejected as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 7956 of 2018
Mahesh Kumar Agarwal & Ors.
… Petitioners Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Anr. … Opposite Parties With A.B.A. No. 750 of 2019
Mahesh Kumar Agarwal @ Mahesh Kumar Agarwalla & Anr. … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. … Opposite Parties With A.B.A. No. 768 of 2019
Kishore Agarwal @ Kishore Agarwalla & Anr.
… Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. … Opposite Parties With A.B.A. No. 8022 of 2018
Kishore Agarwal & Anr. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. … Opposite Parties With
A.B.A. No. 8039 of 2018
Mahesh Kumar Agarwalla & Ors.
… Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. … Opposite Parties
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioners : None, Advocate For the State : Addl. P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mrs. Sachin Kumar, Advocate ------ Order No.08 Dated- 19.11.2019
No one turns up on behalf of the petitioners in-spite of repeated calls.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is rejected as not pressed.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Gunjan-
Mahesh Kumar Agarwal & Ors.
The State of Jharkhand & Anr.
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
