Allowed

Sejamuddin Seikh Alias Sejamuddin v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC25 Mar 2019A.B.A./221/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in an FIR registered under Sections 498A, 364A, 109 and 34 IPC. The court directed deposit of Rs. 48,000 as interim victim compensation and issuance of a bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail allowed subject to deposit of Rs. 48,000 as interim victim compensation, furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, and compliance with specific conditions.

Sejamuddin Seikh Alias Sejamuddin Vs the State of… — Dowry and Cruelty | Jharkhand HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

A.B.A. No. 221 of 2019

¶3

Sejamuddin Seikh @ Sejamuddin

¶4

… Petitioner

¶5

The State of Jharkhand … 2. Nastara Bibi Opposite Parties ------

¶6

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶7

For the Petitioner : Mr. R.R.S. Singh, Advocate For the State : Addl. P.P.

¶8

------

¶9

Order No.03 Dated- 25.03.2019

¶10

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Radhanagar P.S. Case No.597 of 2013 (G.R. No. 988 of 2013) registered under sections 498A/364A/109/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. P.P. for the State.

¶12

Though notice was issued to the opposite party no.2, no one turns up on behalf of the opposite party no.2, in-spite of repeated calls.

¶13

The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations against the petitioner are false and are general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay Rs.48,000/- as ad interim victim compensation to the informant-opposite party no.2 – Nastara Bibi without prejudice to his defence in this case and undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶14

Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

¶15

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the above named petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶16

Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on depositing a demand draft of Rs.48,000/- as ad interim victim compensation in favour of informant-opposite party no.2 – Nastara Bibi and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1^st Class, Rajmahal, in connection with Radhanagar P.S. Case No.597 of 2013 (G.R. No. 988 of 2013) with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

¶17

In case, the petitioner deposits the ad interim victim compensation amount, the court below is directed to issue notice to the informant-opposite party no.2 – Nastara Bibi and hand over the said demand draft to her, after proper identification.

¶18

In case, the said amount is received by the informantopposite party no.2, the same shall be adjusted with respect to the maintenance in any present or future proceeding between the parties or final settlement between the parties, if and when the same takes place.

¶19

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶20

Sonu/Gunjan-

Sejamuddin Seikh Alias Sejamuddin v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sejamuddin Seikh Alias Sejamuddin v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand

Dilip Kumar Rabidas Alias Dilip Das Vs the State of Jharkhand

Vinay Kumar Das Vs the State of Jharkhand

Pramod Pandit Vs the State of Jharkhand

Akshay Kumar Mishra Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sarita Devi Alias Sarita Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand