Allowed

Amku Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC14 Feb 2019A.B.A./210/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner moved for anticipatory bail in a case alleging misappropriation of funds intended for well construction. Court granted bail conditioned on deposit of the misappropriated amount, furnishing a bond with sureties, cooperating with investigation, and abiding by specific surveillance conditions.

What did the court decide?

Grant of anticipatory bail on condition of depositing Rs. 94,500/-, furnishing bail bond with sureties, and complying with investigation requirements.

Amku Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand — Cheating and Forgery | Jharkhand HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

A.B.A. No. 210 of 2019

Amku Yadav

… ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party

¶7

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶9

¶10

For the Petitioner : Mr. S.K. Sinha, Advocate For the State : Addl. P.P.

¶11

¶12

Order No. 05: Dated: 14^th February, 2019

¶13

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Pratapur P.S. Case No. 75 of 2012 (G.R. No. 1020 of 2012) for the offence registered under Sections 420/406 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

Heard the parties.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is one of the beneficiaries of the scheme. It is next submitted that the allegation against him is that though he has received Rs. 94,500/- which has been sanctioned for construction of well in his field but he has not completed the excavation and construction work of well and misappropriated the Government fund. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to deposit the amount Rs. 94,500/- before the Block Development Officer, Kunda in the district of Chatra without prejudice to his defence in the case. It is further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail

¶16

The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶17

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that this is a fit case where the petitioner, named above, be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on showing the proof of deposit of Rs. 94,500/- Block Development Officer, Kunda in the district of

¶18

Chatra and furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SubDivisional Judicial Magistrate, Chatra in connection with Pratapur P.S. Case No. 75 of 2012 (G.R. No. 1020 of 2012) subject to the condition laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions that:

¶19

I. the petitioner will co-operate with the investigation of the case,

¶20

II. the petitioner will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed.

¶21

III. the petitioner will furnish his mobile phone numbers and copy of Aadhar Card by way of filing affidavit in the court below and will undertake that he will not change his mobile phone numbers during the pendency of this case.

¶22

If Investigating Officer requires mobile phone numbers of the petitioner, he can make appropriate prayer before the trial court and on such prayer being made the court below will provide mobile number of the petitioner to the Investigating Officer.

¶23

At the time of conclusion, the trial court will pass appropriate order regarding the amount deposit by the petitioner with Block Development Officer, Kunda in the district of Chatra.

¶24

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)

¶25

Amku Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amku Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arvind Tiwari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Narad Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Dulari Devi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ajay Kumar Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Aman Kumar Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Satendra Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand