Allowed

Magru Shaw Alias Magru Mandal v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC7 Feb 2019A.B.A./5/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

During a petition filed for anticipatory bail for offences of cheating and forgery, the High Court granted the privilege subject to conditions of cooperation with investigation, appearance before the Investigating Officer, and submission of mobile numbers and Aadhar details.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on deposit of Rs. 10,000 cash security and furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties.

Magru Shaw Alias Magru Mandal Vs the State of Jharkhand — Cheating and Forgery | Jharkhand HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

A.B.A. No. 5 of 2019

¶3

Magru Shaw @ Magru Mandal … ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --------

¶4

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶5

¶6

For the Petitioner : Mr. M.B. Lal, Advocate For the State : Addl. P.P.

¶7

¶8

Order No. 03: Dated : 7^th February, 2019

¶9

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Tundi P.S. Case No. 52 of 2018 for the offence registered under Sections 419/ 420/ 120-B of the Indian Penal Code.

¶10

Heard the parties.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations against the petitioner are that the petitioner has fraudulently obtained residential certificate and on the basis of the same he obtained licence for running PDS Shop. It is further submitted that the petitioner has got ration card showing himself as a resident of Jamtara. It is further alleged that the petitioner has also dishonestly got the residential certificate showing himself a resident of Tundi. It is next submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are false and the petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation of the case and also willing to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail

¶12

The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶13

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that this is a fit case where the petitioner, named above, be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 10,000/- as cash security and furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five

¶14

Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Tundi P.S. Case No. 52 of 2018 subject to the condition laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions that:

¶15

I. the petitioner will co-operate with the investigation of the case,

¶16

II. the petitioner will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed.

¶17

III. the petitioner will furnish his mobile phone numbers and copy of Aadhar Card by way of filing affidavit in the court below and will undertake that they will not change his mobile phone numbers during the pendency of this case.

¶18

If Investigating Officer requires mobile phone numbers of the petitioner, he can make appropriate prayer before the trial court and on such prayer being made the court below will provide mobile number of the petitioner to the Investigating Officer.

¶19

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)

¶20

Magru Shaw Alias Magru Mandal v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Magru Shaw Alias Magru Mandal v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Burnanga Oraon Vs the State of Jharkhand

Baidul Sk Vs the State of Jharkhand

Satari Banra Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ambika Prasad Gupta Vs the State of Jharkhand

Thakuri Turi Alias Thakur Turi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Kalam Qureshi Vs the State of Jharkhand