Allowed

Baidul Sk v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC6 Feb 2019A.B.A./81/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused under the Essential Commodity Act for seeding gas cylinders. The court directed surrender with cash security and cooperation conditions within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail; directed to surrender, deposit Rs.5,000 cash security, and furnish bail bond of Rs.25,000 with two sureties.

Baidul Sk Vs the State of Jharkhand — Anticipatory Bail | Jharkhand HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.81 of 2019

¶2

------

¶3

Baidul Sk. .... .... …. Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Jharkhand .... .... ....Opposite Party

¶6

------

¶7

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶8

For the Petitioner : Mr. I. S. Gupta, Advocate For the State : Addl.P.P. ------

¶9

Order No.04 Dated- 06.02.2019

¶10

Apprehending his arrest in connection with Kotalpokhar P.S. Case No.49 of 2018 corresponding to G.R. No.891 of 2018 instituted under Section 7 of the Essential Commodity Act, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.

¶11

Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State.

¶12

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the police seized two filled gas cylinders and twelve empty cylinders in his general provision store. It is further submitted that in the place of occurrence, there is no gas agency and the villagers deposit their cylinders with the petitioner in order to procure their gas cylinders from nearby gas agency. It is submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.

¶13

Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶14

Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Rajmahal within four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.5,000/(Rupees five thousand) as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Rajmahal in connection with Kotalpokhar

¶15

P.S. Case No.49 of 2018 corresponding to G.R. No.891 of 2018 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶16

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶17

Animesh/

Baidul Sk v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baidul Sk v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

MD Mojahid Ansari Alias Mojahid Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Mahabir Kumar Gope Vs the State of Jharkhand

Brajesh Mishra Vs Union of India through the Central Bureau of Investigation

Burnanga Oraon Vs the State of Jharkhand

Satari Banra Vs the State of Jharkhand

Shailesh Gupta Alias Shailesh Prasad Vs the State of Jharkhand