Allowed

Sanjeev Kumar Singh Alias Gopal Singh v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC11 Mar 2019A.B.A./200/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in an illegal mining case under the Indian Forest Act, allowing release upon arrest or surrender within four weeks subject to bond and deposit conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to deposit of Rs. 8,000 and execution of bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties along with specific conditions.

Sanjeev Kumar Singh Alias Gopal Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand — Corruption | Jharkhand HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 200 of 2019

¶2

Sanjeev Kumar Singh @ Gopal Singh … Petitioner Versus

¶3

The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party

¶4

------

¶5

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. L.K. Singh, Advocate For the State : Addl. P.P.

¶6

------

¶7

Order No.04 Dated- 11.03.2019

¶8

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with G (F) Case No.407 of 2014 registered under sections 33/41/42 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 read with Bihar Forest Amendment Act, 1989.

¶9

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. P.P. for the State.

¶10

The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is involved in illegal mining of stone. It is next submitted that the petitioner has got nothing to do with the illegal mining of stone. It is, further, submitted that the allegation against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in supplementary affidavit. It is next submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to deposit Rs.8000/- with the Forest Range Officer, Chouparan Range and undertake not to go inside the forest area or indulge in similar type of occurrence during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶11

Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

¶12

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the above named petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶13

Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on showing the proof of deposit of Rs.8000/- with the Forest Range Officer, Chouparan Range and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M., 1^st Class, Hazaribag, in connection with G (F) Case No.407 of 2014 with the condition that the petitioner will not go inside the forest area or indulge in similar type of occurrence during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

¶14

The Forest Range Officer, Chouparan Range is directed to receive the amount of Rs.8000/- from the petitioner after issuing due receipt therefore, in case the petitioner approaches him for receipt of the same.

¶15

Sonu/Gunjan-

Sanjeev Kumar Singh Alias Gopal Singh v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjeev Kumar Singh Alias Gopal Singh v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Monu Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Akhilesh Nandan Saran Vs the State of Jharkhand and Ors.

Keshiban Bibi And Anr. Vs Sri Dola Ram And Ors.

Akileshwar Singh Alias Akhilesh Kumar Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Chhotu Saw Alias Chhotu Kumar Saw Vs the State of Jharkhand

Jabbar Mian Vs the State of Jharkhand