Allowed

Talo Manjhi v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC19 Jun 2019A.B.A./1951/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to the appellant in a case under Sections 414 and 34 IPC, conditional upon payment of cash security, furnishing of a bail bond with sureties, and cooperation with investigation.

What did the court decide?

Grant of anticipatory bail upon deposit of Rs. 2000 cash security, furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, and complying with listed conditions.

Talo Manjhi Vs the State of Jharkhand — Anticipatory Bail | Jharkhand HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

A.B. A. No. 1951 of 2019

¶3

Talo Manjhi … Petitioner Versus

¶4

The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party

¶5

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶6

For the Petitioner : Mr. Anupam Anand, Adv. For the State : Addl. P.P.

¶7

06 / 19.06.19 Heard the parties.

¶8

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with BTPS P.S. Case No. 15 of 2016 (G.R. No. 133 of 2016 ) registered under Sections 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶9

The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that from the motorcycle of the petitioner, police seized illegal coals. It is further submitted that the allegation against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 11 of the anticipatory bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to furnish sufficient security including cash security and undertake to cooperate with the investigation of the case and co-accused with similar allegations has already been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by this court vide order dated 23.01.2019 passed in ABA no. 8348 of 2018, hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶10

Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

¶11

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the above named petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail

¶12

on depositing cash security of Rs. 2000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1^st Class, Bermo at Tenughat, in connection with Bokaro Thermal P.S. Case No. 15 of 2016 (G.R. No. 133 of 2016) with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

¶13

( ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)

¶14

Smita/-

Talo Manjhi v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Talo Manjhi v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pawan Jaiswal Vs the State of Jharkhand

Indra Bhushan Prasad Sinha Vs the State of Jharkhand

Vivek Kumar Bansal Vs the State of Jharkhand

Zakir Sk Vs the State of Jharkhand

Mukesh Kumar Bhagat Alias Sonu Vs the State of Jharkhand

Pappu Kumar Sah Vs the State of Jharkhand