Mukesh Kumar Bhagat Alias Sonu v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in an NDPS case involving ganja seizure. The court rejected the application due to the serious nature of allegations and the necessity of custodial interrogation.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected; petitioner permitted to surrender and seek regular bail within four weeks.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 3833 of 2019
Mukesh Kumar Bhagat @ Sonu
… Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Aashish Kumar, Advocate For the State : Addl. P.P.
------
Order No.02 Dated- 19.06.2019
Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Pathargama P.S. Case No.53 of 2019 subsequently N.D.P.S. Case No. 02 of 2019 registered under sections 20 of the N.D.P.S. Act.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. P.P. for the State.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is eligible for anticipatory bail considering the seizure of ganja and need for custodial interrogation.
Whether the petitioner should be granted anticipatory bail in the NDPS case.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mukesh Kumar Bhagat @ Sonu
- respondent
The State of Jharkhand
Coram
Anil Kumar Choudhary
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- A.B.A./3833/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court