Allowed

MD Mojahid Ansari v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC10 Jan 2019A.B.A./1762/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to Md. Mojahid Ansari in connection with a criminal complaint involving matrimonial and cheating allegations, subject to depositing Rs. 50,000 as interim victim compensation and furnishing a bail bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Grant of anticipatory bail on depositing Rs. 50,000 as interim victim compensation and furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties.

MD Mojahid Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand — Matrimonial and Divorce | Jharkhand HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1762 of 2018

¶2

Md. Mojahid Ansari … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Jahra Khatoon … Opposite Parties

¶3

------

¶4

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. R. Kumar, Advocate For the State : Addl. P.P. For the Opp. Party NO.2: Mr. M. Prakash, Advocate ------

¶5

Order No.05 Dated- 10.01.2019

¶6

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint Case No.211 of 2016 registered under sections 376/313/323/498A/420/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3/4 of D.P. Act.

¶7

Both the petitioner and opposite party no.2 are present in the Court today.

¶8

Heard the parties.

¶9

The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. Petitioner is ready and willing to keep and maintain the opposite party no.2 as his lawful wife. It is further submitted on instruction that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay Rs. 50,000/- as ad interim victim compensation to the opposite party no.2 without prejudice to his defence in this case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶10

Learned Addl. P.P. assisted by the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

¶11

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the above named petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of

¶12

two months from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on depositing a demand draft of Rs. 50,000/- as ad interim victim compensation in favour of opposite party no.2-Jahra Khatoon and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Gumla, in connection with Complaint Case No.211 of 2016 subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

¶13

In case, the petitioner deposits the ad interim victim compensation amount, the court below is directed to issue notice to the opposite party no.2-Jahra Khatoon and hand over the said demand draft to her, after proper identification.

¶14

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶15

Sonu/Gunjan-

MD Mojahid Ansari v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

MD Mojahid Ansari v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdur Raheem Ansari And Ors. Vs The State Of Jharkhand

Rajesh Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand

Balbhadra Sundi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Temba Oraon Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sanjay Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ramjeet Giri Vs the State of Jharkhand