Ram Sahay Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is wholly innocent and there is no specific overt act alleged against him but he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is also submitted the petitioner is aged about 57 years and he is in jail custody since 29.09.2018. Hence, petitioner deserves bail.

¶13

Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶14

From the impugned order, it appears that the alleged tractor and trailor from which various types of weapons collected from before which were used in the crime belongs to the petitioner and he is only order giver.

¶15

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also keeping in view the period of detention , the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of JM Ist Class, Giridih, in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No. 266/2018, corresponding to G.R. No. 2161/2018.

¶16

Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court below through FAX.

¶17

(Anant Bijay Singh, J.)

¶18

Raman /-

Ram Sahay Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Sahay Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amit Kumar Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Manoj Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Tarak Nath Mishra Vs the State of Jharkhand

Anil Gupta Vs the State of Jharkhand

Bijay Haiburu Vs the State of Jharkhand

MD Shoukat Ali Farooque Vs the State of Jharkhand