Petitioners sought permission to withdraw the writ petition to prefer representation before respondent-authorities. The court granted permission and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S).No. 690 of 2018
---------Fulljems Khaka & Ors. … … … ... Petitioners - Versus - State of Jharkhand & Ors. … … ... …. Respondents
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S.N.PATHAK For the Petitioners : Mr. Awanish Ranjan Mishra, Advocate For the State : Mr. Samir Sahay, AC to AG For the JSSC : Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Advocate
05/ 01.10.2018 After some arguments, Mr. Awanish Ranjan Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition, to prefer representation before the respondent-authorities.
Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the said
withdrawal.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty aforesaid.
(Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.)
Kunal/-
Fulljems Khaka & Ors.
State of Jharkhand & Ors.
Dr. S.N. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
