Petitioner failed to appear despite calls; court dismissed writ petition for non-prosecution.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P. (S) No. 6475 of 2008
…
Mostt. Urmila Devi … … Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand & Ors … Respondents
CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK.
For the Petitioner : - None.
For the Respondent-State: - Mr. Rakesh Kumar Shahi, J.C. to A.A.G.
06/21.02.2018 When the matter is called out, nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Shahi, learned J.C. to A.A.G. appearing for the Respondent-State is present.
On 14.02.2018 also, nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioner in spite of repeated calls.
It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to pursue the writ application.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Pramath Patnaik, J.)
APK
Mostt. Urmila Devi
The State of Jharkhand
Pramath Patnaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
