Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed; petitioner sought to withdraw same; consent of court recorded and writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (S) No.2909 of 2010
Soma Rani, Daughter of Shri Shaligram Sah, resident of Mohalla-Purandaha, P.O. and P.S.-Deoghar, District-Deoghar (Jharkhand). .... Petitioner
Versus
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent : J.C to A.A.G -----
09/26.02.2018 Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mishra, learned counsel on behalf of Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, submits that he wants to withdraw the writ petition.
Permission, as sought for, is accorded.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
( Pramath Patnaik, J .)
RKM
Soma Rani
The State of Jharkhand
Pramath Patnaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
