The petitioner sought and obtained permission to withdraw the writ petition. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive legal proposition is laid down.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No. 26 of 2016
Omkar Prasad Barnawal ….. Petitioner
Versus
United Bank of India, B. S. City Ind. Estate Branch, Balidih, Bokaro & Another
….. Respondents
CORAM
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
For the Petitioner: Mr. Siddhartha Joyti Roy For the Respondents:
06/05.12.2018 Mr. Siddhartha Joyti Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks
permission to withdraw the present writ petition.
Permission is accorded.
The present writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Satish/-
(RAJESH SHANKAR, J)
Omkar Prasad Barnawal
United Bank of India, B. S. City Ind. Estate Branch, Balidih, Bokaro
Another
RAJESH SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
