In a writ petition filed by M/s Sidhi Vinayak Metcom Ltd., the petitioner's counsel was absent. Consequently, the High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the matter ex parte for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(T) No. 2575 of 2011
M/s SIDHI VINAYAK METCOM LTD. , at Rugudi, PO/PS: Chowka, DistSaraikela Kharsawan, Jharkhand represented through its Director Sri Vijay Kumar Mittal, Director aged about 42 years who is a citizen of India … … Petitioner
Versus
... ... Opposite Parties
------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA
-----
For the Petitioner: None For the Respondents: J.C. to A.S.G.I.
15/Dated 23rd August, 2018
Per D.N. Patel, J.
1. When this matter was called out, counsel for the petitioner remained absent.
2. Neither the matter has been mentioned nor has anybody appeared on behalf
of the petitioner.
3. Hence, this matter is dismissed for default.
(D.N.Patel, J.)
(Amitav K. Gupta, J.)
s.m.
M/s SIDHI VINAYAK METCOM LTD.
Union of India
The Director General of Central Excise Intelligence
The Additional Directorate General
The Deputy Director
D.N. Patel
Amitav K. Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
