The appeal was dismissed due to the appellant's non-prosecution, as no one appeared on the appellant's side despite repeated calls, while the respondent's counsel was present.
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
F.A. No. 47 of 2006
Kiran Chandra Choudhary @ Kiranchand Choudhary ..... … Appellant Versus Rupendra Kumar Jain & Anr. .…. … Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Appellant : None For the Respondent no.2 : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate
17/ 20.06.2018 No one turned up on behalf of the appellant even after repeated calls. However, Mr. Deepak Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 is present.
It appears that this is a years old appeal and the appellant does not seem to be interested in pursuing the matter.
Accordingly, this appeal stands dismissed for nonprosecution of the appellant.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
AKT
Kiran Chandra Choudhary
Rupendra Kumar Jain
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
