The present revision application was dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to appear when the case was called. No substantive hearing was held.
revision application dismissed for default absence of petitioner
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Revision No. 348 of 2003
Adhin Toppo …… Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …… Opposite Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH
--------- For the Petitioner :None For the State :A.P.P
08/Dated: 12/09/2018
Today, when the case is called out, nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Accordingly, this revision application is dismissed for default.
(Anant Bijay Singh, J.)
Satyarthi/-
Adhin Toppo
The State of Jharkhand
Anant Bijay Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
