In Cr. Rev. No. 345 of 2003, the High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the criminal revision for default as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner when the case was called.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Revision No. 345 of 2003
Radha Kumari …… Petitioner
Versus
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH
For the Petitioner : None For the State : A.P.P
11/Dated: 11/09/2018
Today, when the case is called out, nobody appeared on behalf of the
petitioner.
Accordingly, this criminal revision is dismissed for default.
(Anant Bijay Singh, J.)
Satyarthi/-
Radha Kumari
The State of Jharkhand
Pateshwar Sahu
Anant Bijay Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
