Single judge allowed an application for restoration of Cr.M.P. No. 2603 of 2017, rejecting earlier non-compliance and restoring the matter to its original file.
Cr.M.P. No. 2603 of 2017 is restored to its original file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 530 of 2018
Kissan Singh @ Kishan Singh … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand … … 2. Madan Lal Agarwal Opp. Parties
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State : A.P.P.
03/13.03.2018 Heard Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned A.P.P.
This application has been preferred by the petitioner for restoration of Cr.M.P. No. 2603 of 2017 which stood rejected for non-compliance of the order dated 22.11.2017.
Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the instant application, the same is allowed and Cr.M.P. No. 2603 of 2017 is restored to its original file.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
Umesh/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for restoration of Cr.M.P. No. 2603 of 2017 should be allowed in view of satisfied reasons.
Kissan Singh @ Kishan Singh
The State of Jharkhand
Madan Lal Agarwal
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
