Bimal Kumar Thakur v. the State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Jharkhand suo motu listed a contempt case to correct typographical errors in a dated 06.12.2018 order, specifically amending the cited writ petition number and disposal date to reflect the correct 2016 references.
What did the court decide?
The order dated 06.12.2018 is modified to correct the writ petition number and disposal date.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No. 475 of 2017
Bimal Kumar Thakur..…................ Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand & Ors. ………… Opp. Parties …… Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ananda Sen …… For the Petitioner : Mr. V.N.Jha, Advocate For the State : JC to GP-I. ……
8/21.12.2018 This contempt case has been listed suo motu by this Court after detecting that there is some typographical error in the order dated 06.12.2018.
It appears that in the order dated 06.12.2018 in second line of para-2 and in the penultimate paragraph the case number of writ petition as well as the date of disposal has wrongly been typed as W.P.S No. 974 of 2018 and W.P.S. No. 974 of 2017, disposed of on 28.06.2018 in place of “W.P.S. No. 974 of 2016, disposed of on 28.06.2016”, which need to be corrected.
In that view, the order dated 06.12.2018 is modified to the extent that in second line of para-2 and in the penultimate paragraph the case number of writ petition as well as the date of disposal be read as “ W.P.S. No. 974 of 2016, disposed of on 28.06.2016 ” in place of ‘W.P.S No. 974 of 2018 and W.P.S. No. 974 of 2017, disposed of on 28.06.2018’.
( Ananda Sen, J )
Mukund/-cp. 2
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to correct typographical errors in a prior order regarding case number and disposal date of a writ petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Bimal Kumar Thakur
- respondent
State of Jharkhand
Coram
Ananda Sen
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- Cont.(Cvl)/475/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court