The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and has not committed any offence as alleged in the charge-sheet submitted by the C.B.I. on 29.03.2012. The petitioner has been implicated in the capacity being the proprietor of M/s L.G. Builders & Construction, which had allegedly taken term loan of Rs. 1.83 crores for the purchase of machinery from one M/s Elico Engineering & Trading Company, New Delhi for execution of the civil contract awarded by co-accused Shiv Dutt Sharma, Secretary of Paritran Trust. It is further submitted that even if the allegation levelled against the petitioner is taken to be true, it will transpire that the mastermind of the fraudulent transactions amongst the fictitious companies was co-accused Shiv Dutt Sharma, who has already been enlarged on anticipatory bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 21.07.2014 in A.B.A. No. 4174 of 2013. The petitioner was remanded to judicial custody in the present case on 02.09.2016. Thereafter, on filing of bail application, the petitioner was granted provisional bail by this Court vide order dated 07.02.2017. However, due to non-compliance of the direction passed by this Court, his provisional bail was subsequently
