Petitioner sought permission to withdraw an anticipatory bail application with liberty to file an appeal under Section 14A of the Prevention of Atrocities Act. The court allowed the prayer and dismissed the application as not pressed.
Petitioner permitted to withdraw application with liberty to file appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 371 of 2018
Ajay Kumar Yadav ….. Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Sudha Kumari ….. Opp. Parties
---------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH ---------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Munna Lal Yadav, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P.
05/Dated: 08/03/2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application with liberty to file proper criminal appeal in terms of Section 14A of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act against the impugned order.
Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, with the aforesaid liberty, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not pressed.
(Anant Bijay Singh, J.)
Sunil/
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the anticipatory bail application under Section 14A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
Whether the petitioner is granted liberty to file a proper criminal appeal against the impugned order upon withdrawal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ajay Kumar Yadav
The State of Jharkhand
Sudha Kumari
Anant Bijay Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
