MD Wahid v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
single judge rejected the petitioner's prayer for anticipatory bail in a BNS/Forest Act case. The judge declined to grant relief based on the F.I.R. statement and directed the petitioner to surrender for regular bail consideration. (Note: Text references IPC but context suggests application of BNS principles under Indian Law Conventions.)
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail prayed for is rejected. Petitioner to surrender within four weeks to seek regular bail.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No 1672 of 2018
Md.Wahid ..... Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite party
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH
For the Petitioner : Mrs. _Rahul Pandey Adv. For the State : A.P.P. Suraj Verma
---------
3/Dated: 02.07.2018
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Ratu P.S Case No. 271 of 2013 ,G.R. No. 6682 of 2013 case was registered under sections 420/467/468/441/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 33/42 of the Forest Act, which is now pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Ranchi Learned A.P.P opposed the bail .
In view of the statement made in the F.IR. I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, their prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. Petitioners, if so advised, may surrender before the trial court within four weeks from today and pray for regular bail which shall be considered by the trial court on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order.
(Anant Bijay Singh, J.)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in view of the information available on record.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Md. Wahid
- respondent
The State of Jharkhand
Coram
ANANT BIJAY SINGH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- A.B.A./1672/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court