Petitioner challenged his non-appointment via a writ petition. The court was informed of a subsequent appointment memo dated 25.02.2017, rendering the petition infructuous and disposed of accordingly.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous due to subsequent appointment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W. P. (S) No. 6770 of 2016
Md. Nazizul Haque, Son of Md. Khalil, resident of vill.- Mansingha, P.O.- Narayanpur, P.S.- Rajmahal, District- Sahibganj, Jharkhand
.... ..... Petitioner
Versus
.... ..... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhijeet Kr. Singh, Adv. For the State : Mrs. Bharti Singh, JC to Sr. SC-III
05/ 06 . 03.2017 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on
issuance of memo no. 422 dated 25.02.2017, by which the petitioner has been appointed, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Ordered accordingly.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
R.K./R. Sinha
Md. Nazizul Haque
The State of Jharkhand
The Principal Secretary, Department of School Education and Literacy
Shree Chandrashekhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
