The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed a writ petition for the grant of ACP/MACP in default due to the petitioner's counsel and party being absent on the hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S) No. 1487 of 2015
Umesh Rai (CISF No. 823460049 HC/GD) son of late Kameshwar Rai, presently posted at CISF unit 2nd RSRB. BTN Ranchi, PO&PS-Dhurwa, Ranchi ... ... Petitioner
Versus
... ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : Mr. Rajiv Sinha, ASGI
06/03.03.2017 After this writ petition was filed on 09.04.2015, it remained defective in the Registry. Only by an order of this Court all such defective writ petitions pertaining to grant of ACP/MACP were listed on 14.02.2017 when two weeks' further time was granted for removing the defects.
Tanuj/-
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Umesh Rai
The Union of India
The Directorate General, CISF
The Inspector General, CISF
The Commandant, CISF Unit 2nd RSRB
Shree Chandrashekar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
