Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to prosecute before the appropriate forum. The court granted the withdrawal with the stated liberty.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed with liberty to prosecute the matter before the appropriate forum, if permissible in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W. P. (S) No.5680 of 2016
Bhikhari Prasad Mahato, Son of Late Sanu Mahto, resident of Village- Khesma, P.O. Gomoh, P.S. Topchanchi, DistrictDhanbad(Jharkhand) .... ...... Petitioner
Versus
.... ..... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
--For the Petitioner : Mr. Amaresh Kumar, Adv. For the UOI : Mr. Gautam Rakesh, Adv.
03/ 15.09.2017 The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks pemission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to prosecute the matter before the appropriate forum.
The writ petition stands withdrawn with liberty to prosecute the matter before appropriate forum, if permissible in law.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Pankaj
Bhikhari Prasad Mahato
Union of India
Divisional Railway Manager, Dhanbad
Senior Section Engineer (C & W) I/C, NSCB, Gomoh Junction
Shree Chandrashekhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
