The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner's counsel failed to appear on two occasions, despite earlier adjournments granting additional chances.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (C) No. 4901 of 2016
Arya Bharat Bhushan Tripathi … … Petitioner Versus
1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar
… 5. Land Acquisition Officer, Deoghar … Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : Mr. Rajiv Anand, G.A. IV Mr. Shyam Narsaria, J.C. to G.A. IV
5/05.12.2017 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.
Mr. Rajiv Anand, learned G.A. IV appears on behalf of the
State of Jharkhand.
Earlier also on 27.11.2017, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner and the case was adjourned giving one more chance to the counsel for the petitioner to press the present writ petition. Since no one has been appearing on behalf of the petitioner to press the present writ petition, I see no reason to keep the writ petition pending.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non prosecution.
(Rajesh Shankar, J.)
Binit/
Arya Bharat Bhushan Tripathi
State of Jharkhand
Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar
L.R.D.C. Deoghar
Circle Officer, Deoghar
Land Acquisition Officer, Deoghar
Rajesh Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
