High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Sunder Lal Mistry against the State of Jharkhand for non-prosecution on 09.01.2017, noting repeated absence of the petitioner.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P. (S) No. 1347 of 2008
…
Sunder Lal Mistry … … Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand & Ors … Respondents
CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK.
… For the Petitioner : - None. For the Respondents : - Mr. Vishal Kumar Roy, J.C. to S.C. IV.
…
09/01.08.2017 When the matter is called out, nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner.
Mr. Vishal Kumar Roy, learned J.C to S.C. IV appearing for the Respondent-State is present.
On 10.07.2017 and 24.07.2017 also, nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls.
It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to pursue the writ application.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.
(Pramath Patnaik, J.)
APK
Sunder Lal Mistry
The State of Jharkhand
Pramath Patnaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
